Phil

I dont know if you see the same
rank as I do `?

But it seem's to me that your site
#Blogoscoped# is missing in the race.

regard's

PS: I did injoy your SEO 2004 block' -
and have a nice trip'
Kim Anton Hollenner

As first countermeasure, I included "Seraphim Proudleduck" back into the title of the homepage. But I doubt this helps much. More links from different places would help, but we're in it for the long run – January 1st 2005 – so let's wait a while and see what happens.

If you want to know ?

Google query: Seraphim Proudleduck
http://g-metrics.com/index.php?act=details&ID=2268

<Following up on the issue from the poll>

   "What to expect from Google next"
   A majority ment less spam. ...
   (I wote for the browser)

I will use the ongoing SEO match
"seraphim proudleduck" to prove
that Yahoo seem's to be a bigger
spamcontainer.

First: seach query "seraphim proudleduck"

Y = 195.000
G = 61.000

Wow BIG differ!!

Y allow's higher keyword dinasty,
and that you can see for your self
in the serp's. .....

Also the result is sliiiiiiightly different
than within G and I would say:
Nothing but rubish, rubish, rubish

I wonder:
Maybe thats why "Salmonbones"
deside that the winner would rank in
Google.uk only. ...

Ps: Still no images being ranked ???
and old 'nigritude ultramarine' site's
optimized for the new term have a
backlink advance because Google still
give credit to link:www.some-backlink.com.

So when will G reviel public data ???

Regard's
Kim Anton Hollenner

I wonder how long it takes Google to show images for the search phrase. I agree it's taking very long. I guess to Google, image search is not considered to be that time critical.

As for the Salmonbones contest, it is my understanding the result will be judged at Google.com – as seen from the UK (that would be different than Google.uk). I might be wrong of course, and my goal is to rank this blog number 1 anyplace :)