<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:l="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/link/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/">
		<title>Google Blogoscoped Forum</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/</link>
		<description>Discussion on Google, other Search Engines, SEO, and Google Blogoscoped</description>
		<dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>

				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163674.html#id163674" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163670.html#id163670" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163654.html#id163654" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163639.html#id163639" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163635.html#id163635" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163634.html#id163634" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163625.html#id163625" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163598.html#id163598" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163595.html#id163595" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163594.html#id163594" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163590.html#id163590" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163587.html#id163587" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163585.html#id163585" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163582.html#id163582" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163578.html#id163578" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163573.html#id163573" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163571.html#id163571" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163567.html#id163567" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163565.html#id163565" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163557.html#id163557" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163674.html#id163674">
		<title>Google login seal extraction</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163674.html#id163674</link>
		<description>Hi all, 

I was wondering whether it would be possible to grab the code of the google signing form in order to embed into a personal homepage. This of course might be forbidden due to security reason so i'm just asking. I believe  iwould need to modify it so that it points to the google's servers.

thank you

(I believe i already asked this question but i have no idea if it's on this forum or not, i can't find it anywhere !)</description>
		<dc:creator>GuillaumeB</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
Hi all, 

I was wondering whether it would be possible to grab the code of the google signing form in order to embed into a personal homepage. This of course might be forbidden due to security reason so i'm just asking. I believe  iwould need to modify it so that it points to the google's servers.

thank you

(I believe i already asked this question but i have no idea if it's on this forum or not, i can't find it anywhere !) ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163674.html#id163674" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163670.html#id163670">
		<title>Google: Long, Soft, Smooth</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163670.html#id163670</link>
		<description>"Anywho, according to Google's own machine translation, the subtext of this product reads, "Very long, soft, smooth. Of high vacuum, because you always!" Reflect on that while you pick up the simmering scraps of your mind -- work can wait"


http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/this-googles-made-from-100-virgin-pulp-not-chrome/</description>
		<dc:creator>/pd</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
"Anywho, according to Google's own machine translation, the subtext of this product reads, "Very long, soft, smooth. Of high vacuum, because you always!" Reflect on that while you pick up the simmering scraps of your mind -- work can wait"


http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/this-googles-made-from-100-virgin-pulp-not-chrome/ ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163670.html#id163670" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163654.html#id163654">
		<title>Chromium OS running?</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163654.html#id163654</link>
		<description>Hi folks,

Just wondering if anyone else has gotten the Chromium OS up and running? I've managed to, but for some reason the App Bar tab (or whatever it's called; the far left tab) doesn't show anything.</description>
		<dc:creator>Nick Spacek</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
Hi folks,

Just wondering if anyone else has gotten the Chromium OS up and running? I've managed to, but for some reason the App Bar tab (or whatever it's called; the far left tab) doesn't show anything. ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163654.html#id163654" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163639.html#id163639">
		<title>Google Search Stories</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163639.html#id163639</link>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/user/searchstories

Not really newsworthy but i enjoyed this video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R31ge09jaXw</description>
		<dc:creator>DPic</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
http://www.youtube.com/user/searchstories

Not really newsworthy but i enjoyed this video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R31ge09jaXw ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163639.html#id163639" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163635.html#id163635">
		<title>Tabs back on top</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163635.html#id163635</link>
		<description>I use to have my iGoogle tabs on the top, but now they have change the Canadian site to the tabs on the left. I don't like this. Why can't they give you an option to put them on the top?? With them on the left it gobbles up at least 20-30% of your iGoogle real estate.

Hey Google, how about listening to your users for a change?????</description>
		<dc:creator>Blinkr</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
I use to have my iGoogle tabs on the top, but now they have change the Canadian site to the tabs on the left. I don't like this. Why can't they give you an option to put them on the top?? With them on the left it gobbles up at least 20-30% of your iGoogle real estate.

Hey Google, how about listening to your users for a change????? ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163635.html#id163635" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163634.html#id163634">
		<title>[Logo] National Teacher's Day</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163634.html#id163634</link>
		<description>http://www.google.com.vn/logos/teachersdayvn09-hp.gif

on Google.com.vn</description>
		<dc:creator>Moses</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
http://www.google.com.vn/logos/teachersdayvn09-hp.gif

on Google.com.vn ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163634.html#id163634" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163625.html#id163625">
		<title>Scrollbars for Google Wave</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163625.html#id163625</link>
		<description>I just took the GWave survey at https://survey.googleratings.com/wix/p3726709.aspx

I guess i'd noticed it but didn't realize how much scrolling sucks in wave. I thought this GTK demo would be a nice concept to implement:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/popup-scrollbar-concept-demo/

P.S. I now have 100 contacts in wave! This is spreading pretty fast =]</description>
		<dc:creator>DPic</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
I just took the GWave survey at https://survey.googleratings.com/wix/p3726709.aspx

I guess i'd noticed it but didn't realize how much scrolling sucks in wave. I thought this GTK demo would be a nice concept to implement:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/popup-scrollbar-concept-demo/

P.S. I now have 100 contacts in wave! This is spreading pretty fast =] ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163625.html#id163625" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163598.html#id163598">
		<title>"When algorithms attack, does Google hear you scream?"</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163598.html#id163598</link>
		<description>Great analysis piece here:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/19/google_hand_of_god/

"The general impression that Google's search results are entirely automated and objective extends to people thinking they're ranked by how true they are. An aura of saintly impartiality is certainly helpful in the Department of Definitely Not Evil, and Google's own execs reinforce the 'untouched by human hand' legend, even as Google's own explanatory statements shift beneath them, and Google's own lawyers contradict them."
</description>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
Great analysis piece here:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/19/google_hand_of_god/

"The general impression that Google's search results are entirely automated and objective extends to people thinking they're ranked by how true they are. An aura of saintly impartiality is certainly helpful in the Department of Definitely Not Evil, and Google's own execs reinforce the 'untouched by human hand' legend, even as Google's own explanatory statements shift beneath them, and Google's own lawyers contradict them."
 ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163598.html#id163598" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163595.html#id163595">
		<title>Blogoscoped.com Estimated Worth $96.8 Thousand USD</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163595.html#id163595</link>
		<description>Blogoscoped.com Estimated Worth $96.8 Thousand USD
Title 	Google Blogoscoped
Description 	Philipp Lenssen covers news from Google, the search engine world and related topics.
Daily Pageview 	90,024
Daily Ads Revenue 	$132.58
Traffic Rank 	12219(Alexa World Rank)
Page Rank 	(Goolge Page Rank) 


check it out for more info --&gt; http://www.thenetinfo.com/stats/blogoscoped.com</description>
		<dc:creator>pritam singh</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
Blogoscoped.com Estimated Worth $96.8 Thousand USD
Title 	Google Blogoscoped
Description 	Philipp Lenssen covers news from Google, the search engine world and related topics.
Daily Pageview 	90,024
Daily Ads Revenue 	$132.58
Traffic Rank 	12219(Alexa World Rank)
Page Rank 	(Goolge Page Rank) 


check it out for more info --&gt; http://www.thenetinfo.com/stats/blogoscoped.com ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163595.html#id163595" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163594.html#id163594">
		<title>YouTube Automatic Captions</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163594.html#id163594</link>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTvHIDKLFqc&amp;feature=player_embedded

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/automatic-captions-in-youtube.html</description>
		<dc:creator>hebbet</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTvHIDKLFqc&amp;feature=player_embedded

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/automatic-captions-in-youtube.html ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163594.html#id163594" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163590.html#id163590">
		<title>ReGoogle ?</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163590.html#id163590</link>
		<description>"RE-Google is a plugin for the Interactive DisAssembler (IDA) Pro that queries Google Code for information about the functions contained in a disassembled binary. The top results are then displayed as comments to the function and can be opened by just clicking on it."

http://regoogle.carnivore.it/</description>
		<dc:creator>/pd</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
"RE-Google is a plugin for the Interactive DisAssembler (IDA) Pro that queries Google Code for information about the functions contained in a disassembled binary. The top results are then displayed as comments to the function and can be opened by just clicking on it."

http://regoogle.carnivore.it/ ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163590.html#id163590" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163587.html#id163587">
		<title>Even Mr. Chi-City takes on YouTube</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163587.html#id163587</link>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0bGs-hhenI

There are a few reasons i'm posting this video. We're all seen people crying from the rooftops about how YouTube is making some seriously ugly choices in how they handle content, but i never expected to see this from ChiCity (known for "Keeping your refrigerator stocked will get you many women"). It is very well put together, and although none of it is new, i think we're really starting to see people get pissed off about this. 

YouTube needs to be a lot more like daddy Google and treat all content fairly. Stop being copyright Nazis, stop featuring videos, and stop being so "family friendly". More and more users are getting pissed, and some have started competing websites like 
http://freespeechvids.com/ http://donatetofsv.com/
- and - 
http://thevideobay.org/

I don't think YouTube is dying. I just think it's in a long transition period. They've been making small changes so far. They've introduce full HD videos. They've blogged about how video ratings actually suck. They've acquired On2 which gives them "ownership" of codecs that they can open and use with HTML 5 open web video. I've also detailed how they'll finally be moving away from 1 channel 1 user http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163108.html

There's still more needed. They need to drop the partnership program and allow anyone to make money from ads on videos. It's mutually beneficial. I think they've just been held back by having to work with YouTube's shitty infrastructure which i can only hope they're in the final stages of gutting and rebuilding. They need a new interface that's clean and Google-y. Right now Orkut is still better. 'nuff said. I'm sure they're working on these things, but i am getting a little impatient. </description>
		<dc:creator>DPic</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0bGs-hhenI

There are a few reasons i'm posting this video. We're all seen people crying from the rooftops about how YouTube is making some seriously ugly choices in how they handle content, but i never expected to see this from ChiCity (known for "Keeping your refrigerator stocked will get you many women"). It is very well put together, and although none of it is new, i think we're really starting to see people get pissed off about this. 

YouTube needs to be a lot more like daddy Google and treat all content fairly. Stop being copyright Nazis, stop featuring videos, and stop being so "family friendly". More and more users are getting pissed, and some have started competing websites like 
http://freespeechvids.com/ http://donatetofsv.com/
- and - 
http://thevideobay.org/

I don't think YouTube is dying. I just think it's in a long transition period. They've been making small changes so far. They've introduce full HD videos. They've blogged about how video ratings actually suck. They've acquired On2 which gives them "ownership" of codecs that they can open and use with HTML 5 open web video. I've also detailed how they'll finally be moving away from 1 channel 1 user http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163108.html

There's still more needed. They need to drop the partnership program and allow anyone to make money from ads on videos. It's mutually beneficial. I think they've just been held back by having to work with YouTube's shitty infrastructure which i can only hope they're in the final stages of gutting and rebuilding. They need a new interface that's clean and Google-y. Right now Orkut is still better. 'nuff said. I'm sure they're working on these things, but i am getting a little impatient.  ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163587.html#id163587" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163585.html#id163585">
		<title>Don't use mobile for iGoogle!</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163585.html#id163585</link>
		<description>Do not use any mobile and visit iGoogle, or else Google will delete all your data for iGoogle! 
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Web+Search/thread?tid=352d8d31d762db21</description>
		<dc:creator>KM</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
Do not use any mobile and visit iGoogle, or else Google will delete all your data for iGoogle! 
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Web+Search/thread?tid=352d8d31d762db21 ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163585.html#id163585" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163582.html#id163582">
		<title>Recent change to Gmail has disabled some Firefox extensions</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163582.html#id163582</link>
		<description>On November 17, 2009, Google apparently rolled out a new version of Gmail that no longer supports part of their Gmail API for Greasemonkey (http://code.google.com/p/gmail-greasemonkey/wiki/GmailGreasemonkey10API). As a result, this unannounced, undocumented change has caused a number of Firefox extensions (including mine) to stop working. We have been trying to contact Google to find out what is behind this change, and whether it is permanent or not. If anyone can shed any light on this situation, the assistance would be very much appreciated.
</description>
		<dc:creator>john Tourtellott</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
On November 17, 2009, Google apparently rolled out a new version of Gmail that no longer supports part of their Gmail API for Greasemonkey (http://code.google.com/p/gmail-greasemonkey/wiki/GmailGreasemonkey10API). As a result, this unannounced, undocumented change has caused a number of Firefox extensions (including mine) to stop working. We have been trying to contact Google to find out what is behind this change, and whether it is permanent or not. If anyone can shed any light on this situation, the assistance would be very much appreciated.
 ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163582.html#id163582" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163578.html#id163578">
		<title>Google hot trends from 41 to 100 on www.newsonrails.com</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163578.html#id163578</link>
		<description>www.newsonrails.com publishes Google's 100 hot trends. I see they are real because Google responds on the request like http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=... and key words from www.newsonrails.com. Is there any API to get hot trends over 40s?</description>
		<dc:creator>Bob Swinsen</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
www.newsonrails.com publishes Google's 100 hot trends. I see they are real because Google responds on the request like http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=... and key words from www.newsonrails.com. Is there any API to get hot trends over 40s? ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163578.html#id163578" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163573.html#id163573">
		<title>Gmail Labs: Green robot icon</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163573.html#id163573</link>
		<description>http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JE4qNpFW6Yk/SwQ8L_mofEI/AAAAAAAAAas/7N_tx0Kfe0I/s320/green_robot.gif
When you enable that labs you will see who is using android at the moment
http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-in-labs-green-robot-icon.html</description>
		<dc:creator>hebbet</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JE4qNpFW6Yk/SwQ8L_mofEI/AAAAAAAAAas/7N_tx0Kfe0I/s320/green_robot.gif
When you enable that labs you will see who is using android at the moment
http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-in-labs-green-robot-icon.html ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163573.html#id163573" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163571.html#id163571">
		<title>Google AdSense Ads Get Special "Featured Ads" With Stars</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163571.html#id163571</link>
		<description>&lt;&lt;There are reports at both DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld that Google AdSense is testing a new ad format. The new ad format has "featured ads" within the ad units, with little yellow stars next to them.&gt;&gt;

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2555/4115020426_3a02c42482.jpg

http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/021185.html</description>
		<dc:creator>WebSonic.nl</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
&lt;&lt;There are reports at both DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld that Google AdSense is testing a new ad format. The new ad format has "featured ads" within the ad units, with little yellow stars next to them.&gt;&gt;

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2555/4115020426_3a02c42482.jpg

http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/021185.html ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163571.html#id163571" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163567.html#id163567">
		<title>Best (or not) of Street View</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163567.html#id163567</link>
		<description>http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article6140453.ab?service=galleryFlash</description>
		<dc:creator>Juha-Matti Laurio</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article6140453.ab?service=galleryFlash ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163567.html#id163567" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163565.html#id163565">
		<title>Search results posioned ?</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163565.html#id163565</link>
		<description>"Cyveillance has discovered a complex attack vector that uses Google search results to distribute malicious software (malware) to unsuspecting Internet users. Using this attack vector..."

http://www.cyveillanceblog.com/general-cyberintel/malware-google-search-results</description>
		<dc:creator>/pd</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
"Cyveillance has discovered a complex attack vector that uses Google search results to distribute malicious software (malware) to unsuspecting Internet users. Using this attack vector..."

http://www.cyveillanceblog.com/general-cyberintel/malware-google-search-results ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163565.html#id163565" />
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163557.html#id163557">
		<title>The Google Phone Is Very Real. And It’s Coming Soon</title>
		<link>http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163557.html#id163557</link>
		<description>
"Get ready for the Google Phone. It’s no longer a myth, it’s real.

The next “super” Android device will almost certainly be a HTC phone that’s much thinner than even the Droid or iPhone – The Dragon/Passion. This is the phone the senior Android guys at Google are now carrying around and testing, at least as of a couple of weeks ago. If you’re willing to give up the Droid’s keyboard, the Dragon/Passion is going to be a really cool phone. It should be fully available very soon.

Way more interesting are the rumors we’ve been hearing for months about a pure Google-branded phone. Most of our sources have unconfirmed information, which we describe below. But there are a few things we have absolutely confirmed: Google is building their own branded phone that they’ll sell directly and through retailers. They were long planning to have the phone be available by the holidays, but it has now slipped to early 2010. The phone will be produced by a major phone manufacturer but will only have Google branding (Microsoft did the same thing with their first Zunes, which were built by Toshiba).

There won’t be any negotiation or compromise over the phone’s design of features – Google is dictating every last piece of it. No splintering of the Android OS that makes some applications unusable. Like the iPhone for Apple, this phone will be Google’s pure vision of what a phone should be."

Source:http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/17/thegoogle-phone/</description>
		<dc:creator>BizAbh</dc:creator>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[

"Get ready for the Google Phone. It’s no longer a myth, it’s real.

The next “super” Android device will almost certainly be a HTC phone that’s much thinner than even the Droid or iPhone – The Dragon/Passion. This is the phone the senior Android guys at Google are now carrying around and testing, at least as of a couple of weeks ago. If you’re willing to give up the Droid’s keyboard, the Dragon/Passion is going to be a really cool phone. It should be fully available very soon.

Way more interesting are the rumors we’ve been hearing for months about a pure Google-branded phone. Most of our sources have unconfirmed information, which we describe below. But there are a few things we have absolutely confirmed: Google is building their own branded phone that they’ll sell directly and through retailers. They were long planning to have the phone be available by the holidays, but it has now slipped to early 2010. The phone will be produced by a major phone manufacturer but will only have Google branding (Microsoft did the same thing with their first Zunes, which were built by Toshiba).

There won’t be any negotiation or compromise over the phone’s design of features – Google is dictating every last piece of it. No splintering of the Android OS that makes some applications unusable. Like the iPhone for Apple, this phone will be Google’s pure vision of what a phone should be."

Source:http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/17/thegoogle-phone/ ]]></content:encoded>
		<l:permalink l:type="text/html" rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/163557.html#id163557" />
	</item>
</rdf:RDF>
