

While Jeff in his post admits he made an error, he also complains about the many bloggers posting about the issue instead of say emailing him privately:
“In this link-happy world, I have found that people are more interesting in talking about you than talking to you. In the past, I thought that a private conversation was the first step toward resolution in a situation like this. That’s not true anymore.”
Someone in the comments agrees:
“As a blogger, you’re not required to get a response before you post – immediacy is the watchword. As a journalist, though, no editor would have let your item be printed without an attempt to get a response from the other guy, regardless of his status or situation.”
When I posted this, I included Jeff’s response. He said “I don’t have any hidden links, I am not doing anything tricky. From my point of view I am able to fund the operation of my site based on the fact that its home page has a good pagerank.” Bearing this in mind, does it look like he would have reacted to one or a few emails in any other way? No*. Sometimes, it needs a blogosphere to convince certain people. As a positive side-effect, others get a chance to learn when they see the discussion evolving (this wouldn’t happen in 1 on 1 conversations).
*If you take the Wordpress fiasco as related example, the answer is “no” as well; Andy Baio privately contacted Matt Mullenweg about the search engine spam, and Matt responded in similar fashion: “If it can help bootstrap something nice for the community, I’m willing to let it run for a little while.” In other words, the goals justify the means.
[Via Dave Winer.]
>> More posts
Advertisement
This site unofficially covers Google™ and more with some rights reserved. You can subscribe to the feed, email your tips and join our forum!