Lawerence Lessing said :"..a big mistake, but one that Congress can make” |
sidebar : this is an interesting twist ..(at least for google book search) -
"he was told by a Google employee that; "We are not scanning all those books to be read by people. We are scanning them to be read by an AI."
http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/003343.html |
Google at some time addressed the AI quote. It's just speculation, and pretty irrelevant in the end. They will do anything with the data that they can. The most significant ancillary benefit of the books will likely surface in their translation technology. |
maybe Brain ..just maybe.. I can't refute your theory or endorse it, as I have no collateral to do otherwise :)- .... but your theory is certainly fesabile! |
I like how in that post for the link to "Lawrence Lessig: Is Google Book Search Fair Use?" they use a Youtube link. Does anyone else find that ironic? |
My blog post excerpting some key factors
http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000976.html
|
"The judge ruled that because Google receives advertising money from offering search functions, it is not entitled to the same level of free use of the images as other entities would be."
http://goog-ipo.blogspot.com/2006/02/judge-sides-with-perfect-10.html |
