http://www.pronetadvertising.com/articles/googles-growing-list-of-domains.html

Note: It's misleading to say Google own all these domains as this list also includes domains that aren't owned by Google but still point to a Google IP address.

Perhaps this list is more reliable (albeit a bit out of date):
http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/txt/google_dom.html

Tony is right. Diggers have found many inaccuracies.
http://digg.com/tech_news/Complete_list_of_all_Google_domain_names

[Moved]

Google is allevil? http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hs=cm9&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=allevil.org&btnG=Search LOL =)

On the list, a lot of country code domains are missing, like google.ch, google.it

I don't think you will ever have a full list of all Google domains

The Pronet list is seriously buggy.

Like Philipp, I did some spot checking and found a bunch of domain listed that are not registered to Google Inc. Examples include:

wherewas.com
guyindia.com
cashexperiment.com
requesttimeoff.com
Latiff.biz
xn--yvonneschrder-rmb.com
jamesallen.org
veritablebevy.com
tvsearch.com
thedinnerpartynetwork.com

At the same time, several domains registered to Google are not listed including: every planet. for example:
Saturngoogle.com
or Googlegalactic.com
or googlesolarsystem.com
See: http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050721-141040

Also, not on the list:
GOOGLESHOPPINGLIST.COM

GOOGLEREVIEWS.COM

GOOGLEWISHLIST.COM

Finally, this compilation that I put together about 9 months (when I was working at SEW) has a few others not on this list. It includes domains (at that time) held by Google and a few held by Data Docket, a service that it has been known that "holds" domain for Google.
Thanks to Tony Ruscoe for also pointing my work out:
http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/txt/google_dom.html

I seriously can not believe that Neil Patel's not updated his post to say that it's not actually a list of domains Google owns.

I also can't believe how many diggs his post has got! It just goes to prove that you can post any old crap and people will digg it even if it's totally inaccurate... and then other people will digg it just because it's got a lot of diggs... and then all the other "Digg sheep" follow suit.

I marked the Digg submission as "inaccurate". If enough people do that it might get buried. But I guess it's too late for that now.

http://digg.com/tech_news/List_of_Google_domains_is_very_inaccurate

hopefully those who dugg the original will appreciate the correction.

Or to correct myself, I suppose it will not get buried but simply get a disclaimer on top ("this story might be inaccurate" or so).

Dugg, Garett.

Garett: Dugg.

And not because I'm a sheep... ;-)

heh thanks guys :)

next time I'll email you philipp......