Google Blogoscoped

Forum

After Web 2.0  (View post)

Roger Browne [PersonRank 10]

Friday, May 26, 2006
13 years ago11,009 views

Web 2.1 Beta.

Pau Tomàs [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Web 2.1 Labs :P

dpneal [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

"The Age of Google"

Sunil Nair [PersonRank 9]

13 years ago #

Web Two.Oh

dingo [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

Why not a web 3.0? which will not represent quantity, but instead quality

ian [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

Web 2 SP1

Siggi [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

The underlying core of all these problems are the rules of the attention economy: see Goldhaber.

Every application which tries to go beyond that (Web n+2), has to eliminate the individual and his narcistic or economic interests which distorts all utopian intentions of all technologies.

Markus Renschler [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

I know, it is a bit off topic, here but I just noticed it and I cannot hold off:

Happy Birthday, Philipp!

justinf [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

the "we-really-want-another-stock-market-boom-please-please-please" web.

Pierre [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

Web 02, as in Web Oh Two?

Roger Browne [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Webbo 2.

BB [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

Bitch slap O'Riley

Elias KAI [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Happy Birthday to you Mr. Philipp!

What about some WEBBY or New Web

rodflash.com [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

Until we don't find a name, we could call:
"Web (beta)"
(imagine a colorful logo with a grayed "beta")

Seth Finkelstein [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

"Bubble All Over Again"

"Standard Hype"

Doug [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

"Teh Newfangled Intarweb"

yz [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

Happy Birthday to you Philipp!
I know it from google opeating system
thanks for you blog for all of us

Ionut Alex. Chitu [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Web OS or Web As A Platform

Claude LaFrenière [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

I Suggest Web ³...
I propose this on my blog yesterday with a Common Creative licence...
climenole.wordpress.com/

   ;-)

P.S. Frankly: who care ? Web 2.1 or New Web or W³ ...

H4v3 4 N1c3 d4y :D

Ionut Alex. Chitu [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

I love one of the comments from O'Reilly blog:

<< "Sara Winge": I regret to inform you that me and my legal team have applied for a service mark for the business term "Sara Winge." Me, my company – Consolodated Holding Consortium, Inc. – and our legal representation hereby "demand" (that's a legal term!) that you immediately cease-and-desist using our business term in any public forum. The term "Sara Winge" was coined in a brainstorming session from 2003 when we were trying to come up with a new brand name for our top-selling hemorrhoid balm. Any attempts to claim that the term existed prior to said brainstorming session are fraudulent and illegal. I'm sure you understand – this is pretty standard business practice. The law compels us to take "reasonable steps" to protect our financial interests in "Sara Winge Hemorrhoid Ointment". Hopefully you'll agree to change your name before we ask a judge to issue an injunction against you prior to the launching of next month's "Sara Winge Is A Giant Hemorrhoid Conference."

Thank you for your cooperation. As you know we at the Consolodated Holding Consortium, Inc. are activists for open source and open standards, and opponents of software patents and other incursions of new intellectual property laws into the public domain. >>

Mathias Schindler [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Web 3.11 for Workgroups.

Jason Schramm [PersonRank 5]

13 years ago #

Web++

/pd [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

yeah that thread of conversation is becoming heavy. I left my 2 cents on that thread too.

Bottom line : Thier Reputation now sucks.. both CMP and o'Rillley's!!
After all they agreed to the letter "before" CMP sent it out!!

Art-One [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Xtra Web

/pd [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

lets call it ---"web blah blah blah"

...... and if you dont like it

..........................then you can "kiss my blah blah blah!! ")-

<<stolen from Shel Isreal >>

Garett Rogers [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Idustrial Age... Information Age...

<<< Communication Age >>>

ohh... and happyi birthday Philipp! :)

Rituel [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

Happy birthday Philipp :o)

Fire Shark [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

How about Web (OS) X because it looks bether (usually)
how about using WTO (Web Two) instead of www (would be easy to implement and we would have a real Web 2 and it would really be in beta...

webbo [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

Empowered Web ("EW")

hecaitou [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

How about Wob2.0?

That is what I read from that icon.

hecaitou [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

Just read the all post.

It is unbelievable that the Web2.0 guys used the most un-web2.0 way to attack web2.0's allies.

Thanks God, Internet is not trade-marked by the programmers who designed it. Otherwise, we should have typed the "outsidenet" in our blogs.

menneke [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

We keep calling it Web 2.0.

Unless you organize a conference which you insist on calling "Web 2.0 Conference".
Back to work.

Dave Kinsella [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

Take a leaf out of Nintendo's book:

Webii

available [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

can someone explain me what web 2.0 is about?

sebastian [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

Press 2.0
its the age of weblogging.

Sam Davyson [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

available: Web 2.0 is the read/write version of the internet. It is associated heavily with AJAX, blogging, flickr, del.icio.us, digg, meebo + hundreds more.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web2.0

David Berkowitz [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

Let's get binary:

Web 10.0

grumbly [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

web new.0

Randy Charles Morin [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

I like Bubble 2.0.

Scott [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

My proposal: Everyone but O'Reilly can use "Web 2.0" ... O'Reilly can use "Web 2.O'Reilly."

Incidentally, should the creators of "M*A*S*H" send a cease-and-desist letter to the "O'Reilly Radar"?

Jim Hedger [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

The most descriptive term I've read in the past 24-hours is "Web Sue.0"

Perhaps we can simply call this phase of WWW development, evolution.

philippe Lagane [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

I am French thus excuse my English. Why not Web of today or Web now

Dantalion [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

O'Rly Web.

/pd [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

sidebar :- the chatter on this story.. its really getting nasty!!

flickr.com/photos/thomashawk/1 ...


img516.imageshack.us/img516/55 ...

Martin [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

> Unless you organize a conference which you insist on calling "Web 2.0 Conference".

How about you read the servicemark application? They did not register "Web 2.0 Conference", they registered "WEB 2.0". So "Web 2.0 Get-Together", "Web 2.0 World" or anything else in that direction is prohibited.

Scott [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

By the way, here is the USPTO record of the "Web 2.0" service mark:

tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield? ...

Note that it says, "No claim is made to the exclusive right to use 'Web' apart from the mark shown."

Well, isn't that nice of O'Reilly? We can still say "Web" without worry.

I'd say it's lucky for O'Reilly (and for everyone) that Tim Berners-Lee didn't try to trademark – or copyright or patent – the Web itself!

Seth Finkelstein [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Scott: That URL expires.

Use this:

tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?re ...

Michael White [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

webweb

Mark Draughn [PersonRank 5]

13 years ago #

rodflash.com says: Until we don't find a name, we could call: "Web (beta)"

I'm pretty sure that "beta" is a registered service mark of Google Incorporated, a Delaware corporation.

modicr [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

Web>2.0

Tom O'Leary [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

1. Webolution
2. Internet v.2

or

Web 2.0 and we all ignore Mr. O'Reilly or anyone else who attempts to own a generic term, laughing at them when they become serious about the issue.

Heck, next they'll want to trademark 'conference'.

Best regards

Tom O'Leary
Editor, The Messaging Times

Robert G. Medford [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

I've just trademarked "Wev 2.0" to corner the typo market. I can almost smell the sweet piles of green heading my way.

Dinesh [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

web v2 is easy to pronounce. :)

J. McNair [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Well, let's review our options:

Microsoft naming allows you to come up with wildly inconsistent naming
Examples: Web Vista, Web Mondo, Web.NET, Web LIVE! Web 200x

Sun naming allows one reset the major version number or naming scheme every so often
Examples: Web 2.1 becomes Web ONE. Web 5.7 becomes Spider 7

Apple naming allows you to associate it with cool animals (I chose primates):
Examples: Web X Silverback, Web X Orangutan, Web X Bonobo

Google Naming tells you to name it after its function and/or stick a G in front of it and a "beta" or "labs" after it.
Examples: Google Web (beta), Google Labs gWeb

Finally Web 2.0 naming, where the name has to be "cute", "funny", "clever", or "completely unrelated to anything as long as it can be trademarked".
Examples: Webr, Aetherweb, MyWeb, Webzo, Netissimo, 108domains, Dubedo, Thangbo, Zonzuba

hecaitou [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

www---web1.0
wwww---web2.0

jim hedger [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

"'m pretty sure that "beta" is a registered service mark of Google Incorporated, a Delaware corporation."

LOL Mark. :) thanks

Seth Finkelstein [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

"Hype Infinity"

James Bradbury [PersonRank 5]

13 years ago #

Here's mine:


jekbradbury.googlepages.com/go ...

orhan [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

web reloaded

Haochi [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

Web [squareroot of 4], after web 3, web [pi]

Philipp Lenssen [PersonRank 10]

13 years ago #

(And a thanks to all the birthday greetings in this thread as well!)

Jon M [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

it's fun to read all the comments and ideas here about what to call the post-"web 2.0" era. but in our thinking about the future of the internet, why do we users and creators insist on sticking to the term "web"?

in a conceptual way, I think the web's presence as we view it might settle into more of a background role that gives way to a place of richer "content" (as we now call all this stuff), and we'll start to see real artists emerging from this foundation we have. that and the foundation will continue to get more robust. but just think about other forms of media we have – do people have a slick name for every time a new magazine publishing improvement is made?

with the coming years the term "web" will feel affectionately old and dated, and it will become a nice artifact that we can all say we were a part of.

Klas Kihlberg [PersonRank 0]

13 years ago #

Why not back to read/write web? Even though I think web 2.0 is "catchy" and a good term that helps spread all new services.

Hans A. Koch [PersonRank 1]

13 years ago #

How about StopWeb2.com
And Just move on.

This thread is locked as it's old... but you can create a new thread in the forum. 

Forum home

Advertisement

 
Blog  |  Forum     more >> Archive | Feed | Google's blogs | About
Advertisement

 

This site unofficially covers Google™ and more with some rights reserved. Join our forum!